Rachelle Starreveld vs Daria Maria Tudor Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jun at 10:59 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Starreveld vs D. Maria Tudor

 NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Starreveld 1 - 0 Tudor
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rachelle Starreveld winning 2 and Daria Maria Tudor winning 0. The last match between Rachelle Starreveld and Daria Maria Tudor was at the W15 Banja Luka, 03-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Rachelle Starreveld getting the victory 7-5 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Starreveld | 1 | 
| Tudor | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Banja Luka(06-03-25)
R. Starreveld vs D. M. Tudor H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 29.27% (12-29) | Career Total W/L | 26.00% (13-37) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
R. Starreveld vs D. M. Tudor Match Preview:
- Tudor's second serve has been a weak point recently, winning only 28.57% of points compared to Starreveld's 46.84%. Could this be a deciding factor in the upcoming match?
 - In terms of returning games, Tudor seems more effective, capturing 50% of points on opponents' second serves compared to Starreveld’s 41.35%.
 - Tudor also outperforms Starreveld on first serve returns, with a win rate of 37.93% opposed to Starreveld’s 28.28%.
 - When under pressure, saving breakpoints can be crucial. Tudor has been slightly better at this, with a 47.62% success, compared to Starreveld's 46.15%.
 - Over the past year, Tudor has a marginally better match win rate at 36.67%, while Starreveld's stands at 33.33%.
 - Both players perform best on clay; however, Tudor has a slightly higher career win percentage on this surface.
 - Looking at tournament level, Tudor plays predominantly in $10K-level contests, whereas Starreveld competes mainly in higher-stake events. Does this give Starreveld an edge?
 - Tudor has faced more highly ranked opponents on average, suggesting more experience in high-pressure situations.
 - If the match proceeds to a deciding set, statistics favor Tudor, who has a 67% success rate in such scenarios, while Starreveld has yet to win one.
 - Tudor converts breaker points more efficiently, achieving a 38.46% conversion rate, outshining Starreveld's 14.29%.
 
Editorial Prediction (June 3, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Tudor and Starreveld appears to be evenly matched, yet certain trends and statistics could tilt the balance.
While Starreveld demonstrates superior prowess on the second serve, Tudor's return game remains strong, potentially neutralizing this advantage. Tudor's superior breakpoint conversion and experience in deciding sets highlight their ability to capitalize on critical moments.
Although Starreveld competes frequently at higher-stake events, Tudor's broader experience against higher-ranked opponents may provide valuable experience in critical situations.
Based on the combined analysis of recent performance trends and statistical comparisons, Tudor appears to hold a slight edge and is likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.
Rachelle Starreveld vs Daria Maria Tudor Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Starreveld vs D. M. Tudor H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 10 | Games Won | 5 | 
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 | 
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 5 | 
| 1:18:48 | Average Match Time | 1:18:48 | 
| 55% (28/51) | 1st Serve % | 65% (31/48) | 
| 64% (18/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (18/31) | 
| 39% (9/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 6% (1/17) | 
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) | 
| 60% (29/48) | Return Points Win % | 47% (24/51) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
R. Starreveld Recent Matches Played
D. M. Tudor Recent Matches Played

R. Starreveld vs D. M. Tudor Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.27% (12/29) | YTD Win/Loss | 26.00% (13/37) | 
| 30.95% (26/58) | Sets Win/Loss | 26.85% (29/79) | 
| 39.74% (279/423) | Games Win/Loss | 40.34% (409/605) | 
| 25.00% (1/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 29.73% (11/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 27.66% (13/34) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 | 
| 21 | Aces Total | 4 | 
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 | 
| 38 | Total Double Faults | 61 | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 84.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 104.36 | 
| 63% (363/575) | 1st Serve % | 57% (283/494) | 
| 54% (196/363) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (137/283) | 
| 45% (96/212) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (63/211) | 
| 38% (24/63) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (19/52) | 
| 41% (236/580) | Return Points Win % | 41% (179/441) | 
| 27.27% (3/8) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/5) | 
| 30.00% (9/21) | Futures W/L | 28.89% (13/32) | 
| 26% (10/39) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 26% (13/50) | 
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 
| 0% (0/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) | 
| 80% (15/12) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (10/9) | 
| 20% (15/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (10/1) | 
| 0% (26/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (40/4) |